SEBI Chairperson and her husband’s role in the Adani scam.

Eighteen months have passed since Hindenburg Research published a detailed report alleging that the Adani Group was involved in one of the most significant corporate frauds in history. The report accused the conglomerate of using a complex web of offshore shell companies, mainly in Mauritius, to execute billions of dollars worth of undisclosed transactions and manipulate stock prices. Despite over 40 separate investigations corroborating these findings, the Indian securities regulator, SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India), has not taken substantial action against the conglomerate.

Instead of prioritizing an investigation into the alleged corporate malfeasance, SEBI has seemingly shifted its focus to scrutinizing Hindenburg’s disclosures regarding its short position on Adani stocks. On June 27, 2024, SEBI issued a ‘show cause’ notice to Hindenburg, not disputing the findings of the original report but rather questioning the short-seller’s disclosure practices. SEBI described the Hindenburg report as “reckless” and cited a banned broker who alleged that the regulator was aware of and complicit in the intricate offshore schemes employed by Adani.

The Allegations Against Adani Group

The Hindenburg report raised several red flags, alleging that the Adani Group engaged in a range of dubious activities, including using offshore shell entities for stock manipulation and money laundering. The report highlighted how these entities, many registered in tax havens such as Mauritius, conducted transactions worth billions, raising suspicions about the true source of funds and the actual ownership of shares.

Despite corroboration from more than 40 independent investigations, the Adani Group has continued to deny any wrongdoing, attributing the allegations to a conspiracy against the company. However, the Indian financial watchdog’s reluctance to act on the evidence presented in the report has stirred doubts about SEBI’s commitment to uphold the principles of corporate governance and financial transparency.

SEBI’s Conflicts of Interest

The controversy surrounding SEBI’s inaction on the Adani scandal is further complicated by concerns over potential conflicts of interest involving the regulator’s leadership. Recent revelations suggest that SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Buch and her husband, Dhaval Buch, had investments in offshore funds linked to Adani. Documents have surfaced indicating their involvement with the Global Dynamic Opportunities Fund and IPE Plus Fund—funds that have come under scrutiny in the ongoing scandal.

Madhabi Buch, who became a full-time member of SEBI in April 2017 and later the chairperson in March 2022, had a 100% stake in a Singaporean consulting firm called Agora Partners before taking the chairperson role. Her husband, Dhaval Buch, joined Blackstone as a senior consultant in 2019 despite lacking a background in the relevant field. During his tenure, SEBI implemented significant regulatory changes that appeared to favor Blackstone’s interests, particularly in the rapidly growing Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) sector, further raising questions about the regulator’s impartiality.

The Supreme Court’s Criticism of SEBI

The Supreme Court of India has taken note of SEBI’s perceived sluggishness in probing the allegations against Adani. In a strong rebuke, the Court criticized SEBI for failing to identify the true origin of funds funneled into Adani’s offshore entities. The Court remarked that the regulator had “drawn a blank” in its efforts to uncover the sources of these funds, raising serious concerns about SEBI’s capability and commitment to tackle the complexities involved in the case.

The Supreme Court’s comments have added to the mounting pressure on SEBI to address the accusations against Adani and bring transparency to the financial markets. However, the regulator’s repeated delays and focus on Hindenburg’s disclosures rather than on the core allegations against Adani indicate an apparent reluctance to engage with the case’s full magnitude.

Implications for India’s Regulatory Integrity

The ongoing controversy surrounding SEBI’s inaction on the Adani scandal not only threatens the credibility of India’s financial regulatory framework but also raises broader concerns about corporate accountability in the country. The perception that regulatory bodies may not be impartial—or worse, could be entangled in the very practices they are supposed to regulate—casts a long shadow over the integrity of India’s capital markets.

As investors lose confidence in the financial oversight provided by SEBI, there is a growing fear that the lack of decisive action in the Adani case could set a dangerous precedent. If the allegations of regulatory bias and conflicts of interest are not addressed, it could discourage both domestic and foreign investors from trusting the Indian financial system.

A Call for Reform

The situation calls for a thorough and independent review of SEBI’s role in the Adani affair. Restoring public confidence in the regulatory system will require a transparent investigation into the allegations of conflicts of interest involving SEBI’s leadership, as well as an in-depth probe into the Adani Group’s financial practices. Only by addressing these issues head-on can SEBI regain its credibility as a vigilant and impartial financial watchdog.

Moreover, there is an urgent need for systemic reforms to ensure that regulatory agencies are free from potential conflicts of interest. Strengthening corporate governance and transparency laws, as well as enhancing whistleblower protections, could help prevent similar controversies in the future.

Conclusion

The allegations against the Adani Group, compounded by SEBI’s perceived inaction, have cast a spotlight on the vulnerabilities in India’s regulatory framework. With questions surrounding SEBI’s potential conflicts of interest, including those involving its leadership, the regulator’s ability to effectively uphold financial integrity is being called into question.

As the scandal continues to unfold, India faces a critical juncture: either reform its financial regulatory mechanisms to restore market confidence or risk further damage to its reputation as a reliable investment destination. To read more about corporate governance and financial reforms, visit Corporate Governance in India.

The Adani scandal serves as a stark reminder that robust oversight and transparency are essential for safeguarding the principles of corporate accountability. Investors and regulators alike must remain vigilant to ensure the integrity of the markets.

Contact us for your wealth management and more information.

Email: pramod.gamare@hotmail.com

Phone: 7559411986